July 21, Shalini Sinha (Reading)
June 23, Robin Dembroff (Yale) and Daniel Wodak (Virginia Tech)
June 16, Saray Ayala (CSU, Sacramento)
June 9, Sandra Emonica DeVries (Waterloo)
June 2, Grayson Hunt (Western Kentucky)
May 26, Mariana Ortega (Penn State)
May 19, Dan Lopez de Sa (Barcelona)
May 12, Manuel Vargas (UC, San Diego)
April 28, Serene Khader (CUNY, Brooklyn)
April 16, Meena Krishnamurthy (Michigan)
April 14, Adam Hosein (Boulder)
April 7, Serife Tekin (Daemen)
March 30, Meena Krishnamurthy (Michigan)
March 24, Elizabeth Scarborough (Florida International)
March 10, Shen-yi Liao (Puget Sound)
March 3, Jason D’Cruz (SUNY, Albany)
February 24, Alexus McLeod (UConn)
February 17, Meena Dhanda (Wolverhampton)
February 10, Marcia Baron (Indiana)
February 3, Kyle Whyte (Michigan State)
January 27, Esa Diaz-Leon (Barcelona)
January 20, Liam Kofi Bright (Carnegie Mellon)
December 2, Carole Lee (Washington)
October 21, Tina Botts (CSU, Fresno)
October 18, Devonya Havis (Canisius)
October 7, Robin Zheng (Yale-NUS)
October 3, Meena Krishnamurthy (Michigan)
September 30, Lionel McPherson (Tufts)
September 23, Vanessa Wills (George Washington)
September 10, Saba Fatima (SIU, Edwardsville)
September 2, Jonathan Jenkins Ichikawa (UBC)
August 26, Kenneth Taylor (Stanford)
August 19, Javier Hidalgo (Richmond)
August 12, Brandon Hogan (Howard)
August 5, Alex King (SUNY Buffalo)
July 29, Luvell Anderson (Memphis)
July 22, Paul C. Taylor (Penn State)
July 15, Robert Gooding-Williams (Columbia)
July 1, Lee McBride (Wooster)
June 24, Naomi Zack (Oregon)
June 17, Syd Johnson (Michigan Tech)
June 10, Sukaina Hirji (Virgina Tech)
June 3, Meena Krishnamurthy (Michigan)
May 27, Gwen Bradford (Rice)
May 20, Rachel Cohon (Albany)
May 6, Miranda Fricker (Sheffield)
April 29, Julia Nefsky (Toronto)
April 15, Carlotta Pavese (Duke)
April 8, Lara Buchak (Berkeley)
March 11, Carolyn McLeod (Western)
March 4, Anke Graness (Vienna)
February 19, Andrea Pitts (UNCC)
February 12, Myisha Cherry (UICI)
January 22, Lisa Tessman (Binghampton)
December 4, Carla Merino-Rajme (UNC)
November 20, Tina Rulli (UC, Davis)
November 13, Nina Emery (Brown)
November 6, Julia Annas (Arizona)
October 17, Helen Beebee (Manchester)
October 2, (College of Charleston)
September 25, Helen Daly (Colorado College)
September 18, Lisa Maria Herzog (Frankfurt)
September 11, Kimberley Brownlee (Warwick)
September 4, Neera Badhwar (Oklahoma)
August 28, Devonya N. Havis (Canisius)
August 21, Talia Bettcher (CSULA)
August 14, Marina Oshana (UC Davis)
August 7, Carol Hay (UMass, Lowell)
July 31, Ásta Kristjana Sveinsdóttir (SFSU)
July 24, Alison Simmons (Harvard)
July 10, Alice McLachlan (York)
July 3, Lucy Allais (UCSD)
June 26, Katherine Hawley (St. Andrews)
June 19, Nomy Arpaly (Brown)
June 12, Josefa Toribio (ICREA)
June 5, Lisa Rivera (UMass, Boston)
May 29, Anne Eaton (UIC)
May 15, Elizabeth Barnes (UVA)
April 24, Susanna Schellenberg (Rutgers)
April 17, Denise James (Dayton)
April 10, Teresa Blankmeyer Burke (Gallaudet)
April 3, Sarah Conly (Bowdoin)
April 1, Meena Krishnamurthy (Manitoba)
March 20,
Subrena Smith (UNH)
March 13, Hallie Liberto (UConn)
March 9, Meena Krishnamurthy (Manitoba)
March 6, Serena Olsaretti (Pompeu Fabra/ICREA)
February 27, Cecil Fabre (Oxford)
February 27, Meena Krishnamurthy (Manitoba)
February 20, Ruth Chang (Rutgers)
February 13, Cara Nine (Cork)
February 6, Sara Bernstein (Duke)
January 23, Samantha Brennan (Western)
January 16, Elizabeth Brake (ASU)
January 9, Kristie Dotson (MSU)
December 26, Meena Krishnamurthy
December 12, Gina Schouten (ISU)
December 5, Meghan Sullivan (Notre Dame)
December 3, Meena Krishnamurthy (Manitoba)
November 28, Carolyn Dicey Jennings (UCMerced)
November 21, Susanna Siegel (Harvard)
November 14, Heather Logue (Leeds)
November 7, Connie Rosati (Arizona)
October 31,
Lisa Bortolotti (Birmingham)
October 24, Robin Jeshion (USC)
October 17, Christine Korsgaard (Harvard)
October 10, Janice Dowell (Syracuse)
October 3, Meena Krishnamurthy (Manitoba)
September 29, Meena Krishnamurthy (Manitoba)
September 28, Meena Krishnamurthy (Manitoba)
August 25, Meena Krishnamurthy (Manitoba)
August 18, Meena Krishnamurthy (Manitoba)
August 18, Meena Krishnamurthy (Manitoba)
August 15, Kyla Ebels-Duggan (Northwestern)
August 7, Meena Krishnamurthy (Manitoba)
July 18, Jules Holroyd (Nottingham)
May 9, Luara Ferracioli (Universiteit van Amsterdam)
April 28, Carrie Ichikawa Jenkins (UBC)
April 11, Adrienne Martin (UPenn)
April 4, Rosa Terlazzo (Kansas State)
March 28, Esa Diaz-Leon (Manitoba)
March 14, Miriam Ronzoni (Manchester)
March 7, Kristina Meshelski (CSU, Northridge)
February 28, Rae Langton (Cambridge)
February 14, Lisa Fuller (SUNY, Albany)
February 7, Julia Driver (Washington, StL).
January 31, Sally Haslanger (MIT)
January 24, Meena Krishnamurthy (Manitoba)
January 17, Anca Gheaus (Sheffield)
November 29, Sarah Goff (LSE)
November 22, Judith Lichtenberg (Georgetown)
November 15, Sandrine Berges (Bilkent)
November 1, Meena Krishnamurthy (Manitoba)
October 25, Rekha Nath (Alabama)
October 18, Japa Pallikkathayil (Pittsburgh)
October 11, Meena Krishnamurthy (Manitoba)
October 4, Meena Krishnamurthy (Manitoba)
September 27, Nicole Hassoun (Binghamton)
September 20, Michele Moody-Adams (Columbia)
August 23, Meena Krishnamurthy (Manitoba)
August 16, Meena Krishnamurthy (Manitoba)
August 9, Meena Krishnamurthy (Manitoba)
August 2, Erin Taylor (Cornell)
July 26, Meena Krishnamurthy (Manitoba)
July 19, Meena Krishnamurthy (Manitoba)
July 12 – Meena Krishnamurthy (Manitoba)
Pingback: The Job market and women in philosophy | Feminist Philosophers
One thing, that has come up in other contexts: the more departments separate their searches from the E.APA, the less certain kinds of misfortunes are likely to happen. If a department really needs to have E.APA interviews, maybe they should make a point of NOT having a table at the smoker, so that interviewees feel no pressure to drop by and hang out. If a department wishes to have a table at the smoker for their own grad students to hang out at, then maybe the table can be listed as follows: “University of X graduate students”. This would indicate that the table is not there for X’s faculty to conduct semi-formal semi-drunk post-interview interviews.
Thanks, Phil. I think this is a really good idea. Add to this list something else that has been mentioned numerous times: no more interviews in hotel rooms.
Increasingly, departments are interviewing candidates from outside the US. First, let me take a minute to call attention to the diversity of such candidates: they may be graduate students at non-US universities, postdoctoral candidates in either visiting teaching positions or short-term research fellowships inside or outside the US, or faculty currently at non-US universities, as well as faculty already at US universities. Second, please note that some of these candidates, such as those who just moved to the US in the past few months, may be dealing with financial issues affecting their capacity to pay for accommodation and travel, and/or to send in their job market materials (for example, limited available funds, no credit card as yet, a credit card with a very low available limit, or a credit card that the conference hotel won’t accept).
It would be really nice to see committees affirming receptivity to non-US candidates by recognizing certain needs (for example, willingness to permit Skype or phone first-round interviews if the candidate cannot afford to travel to APA Eastern). Please continue the good work of enabling wholly electronic applications at low-to-no cost. It would also be helpful to develop lower-cost alternatives for attending APA Eastern for interviews, if they remain necessary.
Hi Meena: I’ve been wondering whether to post this non-anonymously, but I felt uncomfortable about that, so hopefully, it’s OK to post anonymously. In 2012, I went for my only E-APA first-round interview to Atlanta. I am a postdoc in the UK, so I had to fly far, and since they only notified me 10 days on beforehand it was very expensive (flight, hotel etc), but it was a dream job so I wanted to have the interview.
A complicating factor was that I was three months pregnant and felt quite nauseated during my first trimester. I asked if I could interview via Skype, but they made it clear it was E-APA or nothing because of the personal contact. Here’s the dilemma: I didn’t want to tell them I was pregnant, because I feared it might count against me. But at the same time, doing a transcontinental flight and interviewing the day after my arrival (for lack of funding I could not afford to arrive much beforehand) with the morning sickness and tiredness wouldn’t make my performance so great. So I decided to risk it: prepare meticulously, buy interview clothes that concealed my growing uterus, and fly in. It was all to no avail – thousands of dollars wasted. The combination of sleep deprivation, morning sickness and jet lag made me screw up the interview.
I’m telling this to say that the people who really wanted to see me on the E-APA because they value personal contact didn’t get to see the real me. Not allowing skype places disadvantages on people who come from outside the US (expenses + jet lag) and it also discriminates against people for whom travel at short notice is difficult.
Preferred Anonymous – Anonymity is fine when it is warranted. Thank you for sharing this. I agree with you and Rebecca. There is a need for alternatives to the E-APA, if not out right abandonment of E-APA interviews as Phil suggests (I am more inclined to prefer this option). I also had a negative experience at the E-APA. I only went once and like Preferred Anonymous, I had an interview for my dream job that I was very excited about. I had my 6 month old daughter, whom I was still breastfeed at the time, with me (my husband came along to help). I scheduled the interview early in the morning, since that was the best time for me and my breastfeeding schedule. Things did not go as I planned. In fact, my daughter cut her first tooth the night before my big interview and woke up every two hours and, on top of this, in the morning, my breakfast didn’t arrive. So, I arrived at the interview over tired and under fed. I didn’t get a fly out. I have often wonder how much these circumstances played into that fact. They may not have impacted my performance at all or they may have impacted it a lot. In any case, I don’t think I performed terribly, but I certainly wasn’t the best version of me that day. This sort story may give us more reason for ruling out E-APA interviews. But, I think, this also raises questions about how to structure interviews so that they can accommodate breastfeeding mothers. My problems wouldn’t be eliminated by eliminating the E-APA interviews. They would have (and did to some extent) crop up during fly outs. I am not sure what would have helped.